Indexwriting
Writing indexNote / Jun 19, 2022

Field note / branding / brand identity / visual identity

Understanding Brand Architecture Before Designing Identity Systems

Why the relationship between brands in a portfolio changes everything about how you design them.

Published
Jun 19, 2022
Length
2 min read / 486 words
Topics
branding, brand identity, visual identity

One company, many brands — or one brand, many products?

Before I design a single mark for a client with multiple product lines or subsidiaries, I need to understand the brand architecture. Brand architecture is the structural relationship between brands in a portfolio — which brands are visually related, which are separate, and how those relationships should be expressed visually.

Getting this wrong produces identity systems that either over-unify (making different products feel indistinguishable from each other) or over-separate (missing the equity-sharing opportunities that related brands provide).

The three main architectures

The most useful framework I work with describes three main brand architecture types.

A monolithic architecture uses a single master brand across all products and services. The parent brand is always visible and always primary. Think of how Virgin applies its name and visual system to airlines, hotels, and financial services — the Virgin brand identity is consistently applied everywhere, with only functional descriptors varying.

An endorsed architecture has a family of sub-brands, each with its own identity, with the parent brand in a supporting endorsement role. The sub-brand leads, the parent validates. Many hotel groups work this way — each hotel brand has its own distinctive identity, with the parent group's name appearing in a smaller, subsidiary position.

A freestanding architecture has fully independent brands with no visible connection to each other or to the parent company. LVMH owns Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Givenchy — these brands have no visual relationship with each other and no visible connection to LVMH in their consumer-facing identities.

How architecture drives visual decisions

The architecture decision isn't mine to make — it's a strategic business decision that should come from the client. But I need to understand it before I design anything.

In a monolithic architecture, the master brand identity needs to flex across all applications. It needs to work for luxury hotel experiences and budget airline seats alike. That's a very different design brief than a brand that will only appear in one category.

In an endorsed architecture, I'm designing two levels simultaneously: the sub-brand identity that carries its own personality, and the parent endorsement that needs to feel validating rather than intrusive.

When the architecture is unclear

Many clients, especially growing companies that have acquired or launched new products without strategic planning, have unclear or inconsistent architectures. Some products feel like extensions of the main brand; others have drifted into feeling independent.

Clarifying the architecture before starting identity work is part of my job as a brand designer. I ask direct questions: do you want customers to know these products come from the same company? Does the parent brand help or hurt this product's positioning? Are you planning to sell this brand separately in the future?

The answers to these questions determine everything about how the identity should be built.