Field note / brand identity / graphic design / visual identity
Designing Brand Patterns and Surface Graphics
How I develop secondary pattern systems that extend a visual identity beyond the logo.
- Published
- Apr 14, 2022
- Length
- 3 min read / 507 words
- Topics
- brand identity, graphic design, visual identity
Patterns are the identity at rest
A logo appears in specific, intentional placements. A brand pattern appears everywhere — on packaging surfaces, on stationery backgrounds, on fabric, on wrapping paper. Patterns are the brand identity in its most ambient form — present but not demanding attention, providing visual consistency and richness in the spaces where the primary mark isn't the focus.
A strong brand pattern is one of the most underused elements in identity systems. Many brands either skip patterns entirely or use them as an afterthought. Done well, a distinctive brand pattern is an immediately recognizable brand asset with significant equity potential.
Deriving the pattern from the mark
The strongest brand patterns I've designed are derived directly from the primary mark — they use the mark's geometric logic, its curves, its angles, or its negative space as the building blocks of the pattern. This creates a formal relationship between the mark and the pattern that gives the identity system coherence.
For a mark built on a circular geometry, the pattern might be constructed from overlapping circles in a specific proportion derived from the mark. For a mark with distinctive angular geometry, the pattern might tile those angles in a way that creates a different visual experience at tile scale than at mark scale.
Scale and density decisions
A pattern system should work at multiple scales: tight enough to read as a fine texture, and open enough to read as a clear geometric arrangement. Most pattern systems I design have at least two specified scales — a "fine" application for large surfaces where you want texture rather than visible individual elements, and a "coarse" application for smaller surfaces where the individual pattern units should be legible.
Density (how tightly the elements are packed) is as important as scale. A very tight density creates a completely different visual effect than a loose, airy arrangement of the same elements. I specify density as part of the pattern specification, not as a variable.
Color in patterns
Patterns need color specifications that are as complete as the main brand palette specifications. Which brand colors can be used in the pattern? What are the allowed background/foreground color combinations? Can the pattern be used at reduced opacity as a subtle background element?
I typically specify three to five approved color combinations for every pattern — the primary brand color combination and several alternatives for different contexts and backgrounds. Restricting the color combinations prevents the pattern from drifting into color uses that aren't brand-appropriate.
When to use and not use patterns
A pattern used in every application quickly becomes visual wallpaper — present everywhere but noticed nowhere. I specify clear guidelines about when patterns are appropriate: on gift packaging and wrapping materials, as background elements in marketing materials, on branded merchandise, as environmental graphic elements. And where they're not: on formal correspondence, on primary marketing materials where they'd compete with the main content, on signage where legibility requires clean backgrounds.