Indexwriting
Writing indexNote / Jul 15, 2022

Field note / typography / graphic design / branding

Designing With Historical Type: Using Old Faces in New Work

How I use typefaces with centuries of history without making work look like a period piece.

Published
Jul 15, 2022
Length
2 min read / 476 words
Topics
typography, graphic design, branding

Garamond, Caslon, Bodoni, Baskerville — these typefaces were designed hundreds of years ago and are in constant use today. Using them well means understanding their history without being trapped by it.

Why Historical Typefaces Endure

The type designs that have survived centuries of use have done so because they solve fundamental optical problems well. Garamond's proportions, its stress angle, its bracket-serif structure — these emerged from a deep understanding of how letterforms read at small sizes in running text. That understanding doesn't expire.

Historical typefaces also carry cultural associations that contemporary faces can't replicate. A typeface with a long history feels considered, authoritative, and established. For brands and institutions that want to communicate those qualities, there's no substitute.

Avoiding the Period Piece

The failure mode is letting the historical associations become the message. A brand set in Garamond with ornamental flourishes, antique decorative borders, and a warm sepia palette isn't using history — it's cosplaying it. The result reads as nostalgic rather than authoritative.

I use historical typefaces in contemporary compositional frameworks. The Garamond in a clean, modern layout with generous white space and simple color reads as timeless. The same Garamond surrounded by period ornamentation reads as a costume.

Choosing the Right Revival

Most historical typefaces have been revived multiple times. There's the original foundry version, the hot-metal interpretation, and multiple digital revivals from different foundries. These aren't all equivalent. The quality of spacing, the refinement of the digital letterforms, and the completeness of the character set vary significantly.

I recommend Adobe Garamond Pro or Garamond Premier Pro over many competing versions for design work. For Caslon, Adobe Caslon has excellent spacing and a complete character set. For Bodoni, I prefer Hoefler & Co.'s H&FJ Bodoni or Linotype Bodoni Book over the many inferior digitizations.

Historical Typefaces and Brand Identity

Historical typefaces can anchor brand identities with a sense of permanence and institutional authority. Law firms, financial institutions, universities, and heritage luxury brands often use classical typefaces as the foundation of their identity systems.

The key is pairing. A classical typeface paired with an equally classical layout and imagery style looks like the past. A classical typeface paired with contemporary spatial sensibility and modern photographic direction looks like a brand that has lasted — which is a much more powerful statement.

Testing at Modern Scales

Historical typefaces were designed for specific print contexts that no longer exist. Garamond was designed for letterpress printing, where ink spread slightly into the paper gave more weight to thin strokes. On modern digital displays, those thin strokes can become too fine.

I test historical typefaces at their intended use sizes on the actual output medium before committing. What reads beautifully at large scale on screen can become fragile at text size in print.