Field note / logo design / process / client work
Why I Always Start Logo Design With a Brief
The questions I ask before touching a sketchbook, and why skipping them costs twice as much time later.
- Published
- Feb 18, 2019
- Length
- 3 min read / 525 words
- Topics
- logo design, process, client work
The worst logos I've designed — the ones that went through seven rounds of revisions and still felt wrong — all had one thing in common: I started designing before I understood what the mark needed to do.
A logo brief isn't a formality. It's the foundation. Without it, you're solving a problem you haven't defined.
The Questions That Matter
I've refined my intake process over years of client work down to a set of questions that almost always surface the information I need:
What does this organization do, and for whom? Not the marketing version — the real version. Who are the actual customers, and what job are they hiring this organization to do?
Who are the direct competitors? I look at competitor logos not to avoid them aesthetically (though that matters) but to understand the visual language of the category. What conventions exist? Which should the client respect, and which should they reject?
What three words should the logo communicate? I limit clients to three, and I push back on vague answers. "Professional" isn't an answer — every client wants professional. I want words like "precise," "warm," "challenging," "accessible."
Where will the logo primarily live? A logo for a packaging brand has different constraints than one for a digital-native company. Physical applications demand different durability from the mark.
What size range will it need to work at? From favicon to billboard is a different technical problem than from business card to website header.
What the Brief Reveals
A good brief tells me three things before I sketch a line: the emotional register of the mark, the constraints on its form, and the competitive landscape I'm designing against.
The emotional register tells me whether this logo should feel authoritative or friendly, classical or forward-looking, serious or playful. These aren't style choices — they're communication requirements.
The constraints tell me whether I can use fine detail or need to design for reproducibility in difficult conditions. Embroidery, engraving, single-color printing, and small-scale digital all have specific form constraints that need to be baked into the design from the start.
When Clients Skip the Brief
Some clients push back on the intake process. They want to "just see some concepts." I've learned to hold the line here. Every time I've skipped the brief to accommodate impatience, I've regretted it. The concepts land without direction, the feedback is vague because the client hasn't articulated what they want, and the revision process becomes a fishing expedition.
The brief protects the client as much as it protects me. It aligns expectations before money is spent on directions that miss the mark.
Revisiting the Brief Mid-Project
A brief isn't a contract — it's a starting point. I revisit it at the concept presentation stage. Sometimes seeing the first round of concepts helps clients articulate something they couldn't put into words before. When the brief changes, I update it, and I adjust the project scope accordingly.
The brief is a living document. The logo process is a conversation.