Field note / logo design / branding / design thinking
The Problem with Logo Trends
Following design trends feels safe but erodes what a logo is supposed to do: be distinctive and durable.
- Published
- Apr 29, 2021
- Length
- 2 min read / 442 words
- Topics
- logo design, branding, design thinking
The Trend Trap
Every few years there's a dominant logo aesthetic that shows up everywhere. Flat and geometric. Responsive logos. The great serif revival. Gradient everything. These trends emerge from the work of leading studios, get amplified by design blogs, and within 18 months they're everywhere.
When a logo looks like it was designed in a specific year, that's a problem. Logos are supposed to last.
Why Clients Want Trends
Clients follow trends for understandable reasons. They see a visual style that looks current and sophisticated. They want their brand to feel modern. They interpret the trend as evidence of quality — if this is what good design looks like right now, this is what we should have.
It's my job to explain why that logic is backwards.
What a Logo Is Actually Supposed to Do
A logo has two jobs: identify and differentiate. It tells people what they're looking at, and it distinguishes that brand from every other brand. Those jobs require distinctiveness. A logo that looks like dozens of other logos is failing at its fundamental purpose, regardless of how stylish it is.
Trends undermine distinctiveness by definition. If everyone's doing it, it's not differentiating.
The Durability Problem
There's also the timeline issue. A company investing in a logo expects to use it for ten to twenty years. A trend-driven design that feels current in year one will feel dated by year five and embarrassing by year ten.
Logos that have aged well aren't necessarily timeless in an abstract sense — they're just not tied to the aesthetic of a specific moment. They were designed around an idea, not a style.
How I Handle It
When a client comes to me with references pulled from design trends, I treat those as evidence of the values they're trying to communicate — modernity, confidence, simplicity — not as design specifications. I find ways to express those values through formal and conceptual decisions that don't depend on following the current trend.
Sometimes this requires a longer conversation about what the logo is supposed to do and why longevity matters. I have that conversation.
The Exception
Trend-driven work is appropriate when a brand genuinely needs to signal that it's current, contemporary, and in-the-moment — certain consumer brands targeting younger audiences, event identities with a short shelf life, campaigns rather than permanent brand marks. For these, the trend is the message.
The key is knowing the difference between a permanent identity and a temporary campaign. Most clients need the former, and they often ask for the latter.